From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 15 14:06:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4DC7DC for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18D592275 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69978 invoked by uid 89); 15 Aug 2014 13:59:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.177?) (mg@grem.de@88.217.180.211) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 15 Aug 2014 13:59:38 -0000 References: <52652ABEC925BB93CB8877CD@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <53EDE679.9050105@wasikowski.net> <2A69DCE1B30998B865D46192@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <2A69DCE1B30998B865D46192@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <930586B8-0400-481A-AE02-F49B325F870B@grem.de> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257) From: Michael Gmelin Subject: Re: Ports, pkg's confusion on upgrades... Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:59:00 +0200 To: Karl Pielorz Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_W=C4=85sikowski?= , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:06:27 -0000 > On 15 Aug 2014, at 14:43, Karl Pielorz wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > --On 15 August 2014 12:52 +0200 =C5=81ukasz W=C4=85sikowski wrote: >=20 >> You could solve this by using your own poudriere - create repos with >> your own port's options and pkg upgrade everything. Your current >> approach - mixing packages and ports - is not supported IIRC. >=20 > Thanks for the suggestion - and I take your point about not mixing ports &= packages... >=20 > Setting up our own pkg repo though sounds like a lot of work (all for the s= ake of about probably 2 packages we need to change the options on) - I'd gue= ss there's no way of telling pkg to use 'our' repo for these 2-3 packages, a= nd the main one for everything else? If it's only about two or three ports and those are leave ports (things like= nginx), mixing pkg and ports works ok in practice.=20 >=20 > I suppose the other option is just ignore packages, and stick to ports? (p= resuming ports will always be around :) >=20 >=20 > I'd also still like to know if there's a way of getting 'pkg upgrade' to s= pit out why it wants to install a 'new package' - when none of the current p= ackages have a dependency on it? >=20 > This is going to happen at some point, even on a pkg only system (e.g. wha= t happens when pkg upgrade says it's going to install X11 [which nothing cur= rently 'depends' on] - but obviously some upgraded package does - you'd real= ly want to know what's going to cause X to be installed? >=20 > -Karl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"