From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun 27 13:17:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA21186
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 13:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from novell.com (nj-ums.fpk.novell.com [147.2.128.54])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA21179
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 13:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from INET-NJ-Message_Server by novell.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 27 Jun 1996 15:17:05 -0400
Message-Id: <s1d2a5f1.007@novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 16:24:38 -0400
From: Darren Davis <DARREND@novell.com>
To: hal@novell.com, brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: portable microsecond sleeps - Reply
Encoding: 15 Text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Hal Snyder <hal@snitt.com>  6/27 12:54pm >>>
Does Unixware do pthreads?  I don't have docs handy here, but think
there may have been a microsleep in Pthreads.

>>>
UnixWare has its own thread implementation that is basically a super set
of the Sun Solaris threads.  UnixWare was going to handle Posix threads
as a wrapper around its own thread impentation.  There is no resemblance
to pthreads in the UnixWare threads.  There is no microsleep in the UnixWare
threads implementation.

Darren R. Davis
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc.