Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 19:42:24 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>, Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng Message-ID: <4FC6DA90.2090303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC6D9BF.703@shatow.net> References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> <4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com> <4FC68FC0.1010707@FreeBSD.org> <20120530213733.GC85232@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FC6D7A1.6060807@FreeBSD.org> <4FC6D9BF.703@shatow.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/30/2012 19:38, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/30/2012 9:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I'm confused by your answer. First, NLS is out of scope for the point
>> I'm making. Second, are you saying that you made DOCS and EXAMPLES into
>> OPTIONS? If so, are you saying that these options will now be presented
>> by default to every user, for every port?
>
> They are now OPTIONS, but they are not presented to the user by default
> in 'make config'. Just honored and set by default.
>
>>
>> If the old NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES knobs are still honored, and if
>> we are not adding OPTIONS for these to every port, then I certainly have
>> no objection to there being default knobs for DOCS and EXAMPLES that
>> maintainers can choose to use for their ports.
>
> Correct. They currently are still honored, as well as set if DOCS,
> EXAMPLES, or NLS are not set to maintain compatibility with unconverted
> ports.
Thank you for the explanation, I'm glad to see that my concern has
already been addressed.
> You can see this in bsd.options.mk
Doubtful. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC6DA90.2090303>