From owner-freebsd-security Tue Oct 17 14:58: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5602137B4C5 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id GAA00986; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:57:48 +0900 (JST) To: Erik Salander Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-reply-to: erik's message of Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:25:30 MST. <39ECB5BA.90C0E3D1@whistle.com> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPSec MIBs? From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 06:57:48 +0900 Message-ID: <984.971819868@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I see there are alot of IPSec/IKE MIBs in the draft state >at: http://www.ietf.org/ids.by.wg/ipsec.html. Is there any work going >on in Kame or Racoon to accomodate these? I think there's problem >report outstanding on kame.net regarding ucd-snmp, but it's IPV6 (not >IPSec) related. I'll ask ucd-snmp too, see if there are any agent >extensions in the works... Thanks. i think there's noone working on it. i believed that IPsec/IKE MIB are still ongoing document (subject to big change). also last time i looked into, it imposes certain implementation model behind it. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message