From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 22 11:40:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA17508 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:40:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA17432 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:40:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA29275; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:40:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Scot Elliott cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD can't find 32M of my 48M without help In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 22 Mar 1998 19:34:12 GMT." Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 11:39:59 -0800 Message-ID: <29268.890595599@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software support wrote: > > > I didn't think the MAXMEM was required for under 64M. > > > > Machine is a Compaq P/166. > > > > [ and other stuff ] > > All my machines with more than 64M (some 128M and 96M machines) report the > correct amount of RAM when they boot. Does this mean they're actually Which is what's supposed to happen. I find Drew's report almost inexplicable and quite disturbing - I'd thought that our memory sizing problems were things of the past. > So is it OK at the minute or should I tell it how much its got? If the size reported is OK, you're OK. Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message