Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:49:48 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388648 - in head/net: asterisk11 asterisk13 Message-ID: <A688E994-8FCF-4876-86CA-8B77BD60A3D9@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <5640BFB5.6010107@marino.st> References: <201506052330.t55NUBZL020965@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1511082001320.2548@anthias> <564044BC.5050203@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1511091255000.2548@anthias> <077EDBDC-8EF1-44FA-9D17-90345C2956F5@adamw.org> <20151109153801.GA60954@FreeBSD.org> <BF08F2E2-64D0-433B-ACE4-270886594519@adamw.org> <5640BFB5.6010107@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 9 Nov, 2015, at 8:45, John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 11/9/2015 4:41 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>=20
>> I think the difference there is pedantic, and possibly more =
confusing. While
>> it is true that "build with" may not always be accurate, "use" is so =
generic
>> as to convey practically nothing.
>>=20
>> My vote is for "Build with modern GCC (from ports)"
>=20
>=20
> Except there's no building if GCC is already in place.
>=20
> The real impact is GCC libraries, which makes the *entire* GCC a
> run-time dependency. That's the kicker, not the building.
That's a really good point.
"Build and run with modern GCC (from ports)"
or
"Use modern GCC (from ports) for build/runtime"
Personally I really like that first one.
# Adam
--=20
Adam Weinberger
adamw@adamw.org
http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A688E994-8FCF-4876-86CA-8B77BD60A3D9>