Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:47:38 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any problems with increaseing the dump(8) block size? Message-ID: <20020912154738.GC32057@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020912031640.GC13261@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20020911170749.GA27252@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020912031640.GC13261@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:16:40PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Sep 11), David O'Brien said: > > I'd like to make this commit to get better performance on today's > > streaming tape drives. It seems my DLT drive doesn't stream well > > with the default block size of '10'. > > Only if we also raise dd's and tar's default blocksizes to 64k as well :) Why do these two need to be linked to dump(8)? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020912154738.GC32057>