Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:08:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, kmacy@fsmware.com Subject: Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607231708230.9403@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <200607232143.24374.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200607221914.15826.lofi@freebsd.org> <200607222341.05180.lofi@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0607221912140.4394@sea.ntplx.net> <200607232143.24374.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Sunday, 23. July 2006 01:15, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >>> On Saturday, 22. July 2006 21:20, Kip Macy wrote: > >> I think it is because WINE stomps on or TLS. Nothing we can >> do about that except patch wine so it doesn't. Look at the >> console messages for: >> >> Warning: pid XXX used static ldt allocation > > Yes, it does indeed trigger those - lots of them. This is a problem with the way WINE is built or something. It is not a threads problem. Please close the PR. Thanks, -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0607231708230.9403>