From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 19 11:42: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8F114DDE for ; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@rush.net) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA20456; Mon, 19 Apr 1999 13:55:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 13:54:58 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein To: chaos@tgci.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tape backup s/w-emulation, recommendations? In-Reply-To: <199904191835.LAA20984@janeway.tgci.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Riley J. McIntire wrote: > I'm trying to find a tape backup package more robust than tar, better > functionality than dump (can't span filesystems?), and maybe a better > interface. > > BRU is out in elf for fbsd 3.1. I'm leaning towards this. > > Lonetar could be used under Linux emulation, but perusing the > lists/newsgroup seems to indicate problems using Linux emulation in that > the software appears to traverse the compat tree rather that the true bsd > hierarchy. Seems to me a workaround wouldn't be difficult for this, tho'. > > BackupEDGE has a SCO release--has anyone tried this under SCO > emulation? > > Any comments, suggestions, experiences etc would be greatly appreciated! Legato has a freebsd client on thier ftp site, i don't know if/how it works though, it seems old. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message