From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 9 20:18:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE5D1065670; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua (universite.broker.freenet6.net [IPv6:2001:5c0:1400:b::27e9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A85C8FC08; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phenom (mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua [10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n89KIbvt023232; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:18:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua: Host mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua [10.0.0.10] claimed to be phenom X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 5.0, engine: 5.00.0.12182, virus records: 632302, updated: 8.09.2009] Message-ID: <4AA80D9A.2000609@ukr.net> Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:18:34 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Li, Qing" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <4AA7FC4B.6090601@ukr.net> <4AA802EF.6090402@ukr.net> <4AA809BF.9050506@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/138676: after buildworld not work local routes X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:18:45 -0000 Li, Qing пишет: > Okay, perhaps I didn't understand your issue correctly. In > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-December/001581.html > the errors are route insertion related. Those routes are not > visible inside the kernel. Now these routes show up in the > table but Squid reports > " After upgrade the system now gives the squid: > (51) Network is unreachable" > Which IP address is not reachable? Do not operate sites on IP 89.209.81.54, when you walk through the squid. If you go to the sites, bypassing squid, then everything works. It seems, squid does not "see" the table of the form: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 89.209.81.54 link#4 UHS 0 30161 lo0