From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 11 08:21:20 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135CB16A418;
	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ted@omval.tednet.nl)
Received: from omval.tednet.nl (omval.tednet.nl
	[IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:200:39ff:fe59:b187])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37D413C458;
	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:21:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ted@omval.tednet.nl)
Received: from omval.tednet.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by omval.tednet.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7B8LBMU000497;
	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:21:11 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ted@omval.tednet.nl)
Received: (from ted@localhost)
	by omval.tednet.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l7B8LAWY000496;
	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:21:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ted)
Message-Id: <200708110821.l7B8LAWY000496@omval.tednet.nl>
From: ted@tednet.nl (Ted Lindgreen)
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:21:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Daniel Eischen's message as of Aug 10, 14:44"
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98)
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, Ted Lindgreen <ted@tednet.nl>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on omval.tednet.nl
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:43:55 +0000
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Recent change in less(1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:21:20 -0000

[Quoting Daniel Eischen, on Aug 10, 14:44, in "Re: Recent change in ..."]
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Ted Lindgreen wrote:
> 
> > [Quoting Daniel Eischen, on Aug  7, 15:41, in "Re: Recent change in ..."]
> > ....
> >>> If so I have a question: how to obtain the former behaviour of the -e
> >>> switch, i.e. quit when EOF is hit twice always (thus whether or not
> >>> when the file happens to fit on a single page)?
> >>
> >> Perhaps:
> >>
> >>  	if (less_is_more) {
> >>  		no_init = TRUE;
> >>  		if (get_quit_at_eof())
> >>  			quit_if_one_screen = TRUE;
> >>  	}
> >
> > Daniel, are you going to check this fix in?
> >
> > (Or must we live with broken "-e" functionality in future, in which
> > case at least the man-page should be updated to reflect the new
> > behaviour IMHO).
> 
> I don't know.  Does it work the way it is suppose to with this
> patch?

Above patch indeed fixes the problem I have reported, i.e. it
restores the original behaviour of the "-e" functionality of
less(1).

regards,
-- ted