From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 7 15:12:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73ADD32A0A for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E37C965 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 15:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25F7623BE for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:05:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PieDBORtUQfp for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:05:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53F6E623BB for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:05:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1491577542; bh=zaiINbCKuGypMcZf2AkhKBreqeID24xy8uMT5Ug6xZo=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=TubGp9thMmZU/B53u1Z0S9GbR9BTRMtRWJiF4UffO/wjst1IdwpKSuMdg9nIR6IO0 E2Tnce4cGCny6jCrAc9udyNfKKPyo7xbPxsBOj/0/6ecXaw3bNQPHnZQZXarHnQEfm ESOspCDFW6NaLk7kVwpNsstR3rNAXfcqKD0T8XqS0aDzTGkc9fQAK/hzu+kIO9ZCy4 RXIFuJOZpvE3snw8RvYqocmCFKCI8nyLRS5tl4PCEOeWw7SJwWfXUJuzloVjd3mwgI pH2XxxVp/r2yCT4lG0XDiT54ppribTS8Mwwgld2NFfLCp/ydTtHDs2OIGrfmld5pvL x6VyI0SjUl57g== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:05:42 -0400 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:05:42 -0400 Subject: FreeBSD-11 difference between enscript-letter and enscript-letterdj From: "James B. Byrne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:12:09 -0000 What is the difference between these two packages: encript-letter and enscript-letterdj? Why and when would one be preferred over the other? P.S. Are there any limitations on printing from jails? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3