From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 4 12: 4:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B4714CBB for ; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 12:04:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08044; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 13:02:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA82653; Sun, 4 Apr 1999 13:03:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199904041903.NAA82653@harmony.village.org> To: Chuck Robey Subject: Re: gdb 4.17 Cc: "David O'Brien" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Mar 1999 07:55:18 EST." References: Date: Sun, 04 Apr 1999 13:03:13 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Chuck Robey writes: : You know what you're doing, but I want to suggest that perhaps you want : to run that archs part past Warner, who recently (boy, I hope it was : Warner, I think it was) added the MIPS stuff into the tree, and is : pretty strongly in favor of making cross-compilation possible. Yes. I added support to our binutils to generate mips binaries. I think that if other groups want their port in the tree, that should be the first step, with the second making egcs work for the port. I hope to have that done in the next couple of weeks. The only other two architectures that I think there'd be support for would be sparc and arm. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message