From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 19 10:59:52 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4404016A419; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193EC13C4CC; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0763047831; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 05:53:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:53:58 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: <86ir2vklnm.fsf@ds4.des.no> Message-ID: <20071219105229.T95322@fledge.watson.org> References: <20071218120359.E15521@fledge.watson.org> <47682ED1.7000702@FreeBSD.org> <20071218204401.E33011@fledge.watson.org> <86ir2vklnm.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="621616949-1563880115-1198061638=:95322" Cc: Maxim Sobolev , current@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:59:52 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --621616949-1563880115-1198061638=:95322 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Robert Watson writes: >> I'd certainly be fine with it being added to GENERIC on our various=20 >> architectures. > > s/GENERIC/DEFAULTS/ At the risk of creating a bikeshed, I thought we had a consensus that DEFAU= LTS=20 should never be used :-). What I'd love to get, as a bikeshed alternative, would be feedback on the= =20 usability of DDB scripting, output capture, and textdumps... I know there = are=20 a few nits, such as the fact that "continue" at the end of an=20 automatically-run script for a KDB entry event still results in sitting at = a=20 DDB prompt, for example. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge --621616949-1563880115-1198061638=:95322--