From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 21:56:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5C316A420; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:56:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: from mail.freebsdmall.com (69.50.233.168.ip.nectartech.com [69.50.233.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0763643D48; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:56:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from murray@freebsdmall.com) Received: by mail.freebsdmall.com (Postfix, from userid 2074) id C8B1F1D71B4E; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:56:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:56:48 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20060213215648.GC20768@freebsdmall.com> References: <200601312347.k0VNltZ6090432@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060213215407.GB20768@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060213215407.GB20768@freebsdmall.com> X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/news news.xml X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:56:49 -0000 On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:54:07PM -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > A commit bit upgrade has never before been announced in the news box. > This bumped off the Foundation Announcement about the December > newsletter from the front page of the website. I think by announce he > meant a mail to developers@FreeBSD.org, as that is the custom. > > In general, I try to keep other news items here so that new committer > announcements don't dominate the project news box. It looks silly to > have our front page dominated by 'new committer' announcements, which > are irrelevant for most visitors to our website. (I still think they > belong, but I don't want to make the problem worse by also adding > commit bit upgrades to the box). I should point out an even better way to approach this problem would just be to have everyone write more news flashes about the cool stuff going on around the project. - Murray