From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 23 7:32:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC0B37BA97 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 07:32:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p18-dn03kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.232.224.147]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id XAA12762; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:32:35 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <397B0214.46379EE6@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 23:32:52 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysutils/memtest and FreeBSD References: <20000721175757.B319@Fedaykin.here> <3979B777.A8AD8511@newsguy.com> <20000722181330.A404@Fedaykin.here> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > > Besides, a failing malloc should return NULL, shouldn't > it? I would have expected core if I had malloc_options="X" which > I do not (in fact, I have no malloc_options). IF the malloc fails, it should return NULL. But this only happens in the case of artificial limits. > ps: Perhaps you could check the code, it is only 11K long. Sure, send it. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@white.bunnies.bsdconspiracy.net Satan was once an angel, Gates started by writing a BASIC interpreter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message