From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 17 13:30:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C350812 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x22d.google.com (mail-yh0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CEA22FB7 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i57so527731yha.4 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:30:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=rRPUdicJwoDwhewBHSaFsTEW0SP3WjwFhFD16fRzUuY=; b=0ok3o8z3htIZZselmL2HzE9FWy0VmxKYyZisEVhY2DPss9W4RKUzeqG8IJavSc5a2w rofb/NY54YSTky3buUvbf5wDxOP8c12DvccpKkZWR2xqtd34iI+V3vNyCAj2L6WkPzsu zPKY2jwa80dDV1gcWdKRUBIwEa7EpoLdKTYYsuzaCI4o+hEx1rvd8Osxj55Y/WdO7rzu g0i0oTyWYuByrPvy/U6Fpy4fITFip4d3dA8idu0CNLJgVo0GWdyx20IVQiCLJULuSO8L 70KJcxLCTwV2cveS3CEaTAPMtcf/cT0AlF58zzhznYwiHZ4Rcup7fw9H7ELe+FOFtL8t RGBg== X-Received: by 10.236.27.196 with SMTP id e44mr6900283yha.16.1382016651075; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.100] (201-95-159-113.dsl.telesp.net.br. [201.95.159.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c44sm128678994yho.20.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Renato Botelho Message-ID: <525FE686.9050507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:30:46 -0300 From: Renato Botelho Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libiconv problem on dansguardian-(devel) References: <20131017131934.09d016cf4abfe5c6926e40d7@mimar.rs> <525FDA4B.4060509@passap.ru> <525FDE61.70109@FreeBSD.org> <525FDFFE.8050508@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <525FDFFE.8050508@passap.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X76sNqMhtiAor3OnEQWWqPhO9iQcW3xKo" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:30:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --X76sNqMhtiAor3OnEQWWqPhO9iQcW3xKo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17-10-2013 10:02, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 17.10.2013 16:56, Renato Botelho =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> On 17-10-2013 09:38, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> 17.10.2013 15:19, Marko Cupa=C4=87 =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>> >>>> I cannot compile either of the two with NTLM option enabled: >>>> www/dansguardian >>>> www/dansguardian-devel >>>> >>>> This is on 9.2-RELEASE i386. >>>> >>>> Both fail with the same error message: >>>> >>>> ---- error message ---- >>>> checking for NTLM support... yes >>>> checking for iconv... no >>>> no >>>> checking for iconv in -liconv... no >>>> no >>>> checking for libiconv in -liconv... no >>>> configure: error: no native or standard library iconv function found= ! (needed by NTLM plugin - try again with "--with-libiconv"?) >>>> =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. >>>> ---- error message ---- >>>> >>>> Any idea how to fix this? >>> >>> I think that the right way is to include iconv to Uses unconditionall= y >>> (keeping in mind that --with-libiconv=3D${LOCALBASE} also was used >>> unconditionally before switching to Uses/iconv.mk). The same for >>> www/dansguardian-devel. >>> >>> The proposed patch attached. >> >> Thanks Boris, feel free to commit it please. >=20 > Ok, I have a question though. Should a PORTREVISION be bumped? > The package for 11-x and 10-x won't change, however for 9.x and 8.x > would. I assume that to be on a safe side it's better to bump it. > What do you think? Thanks! I agree with bumping, sounds more safe. --=20 Renato Botelho GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc --X76sNqMhtiAor3OnEQWWqPhO9iQcW3xKo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSX+aGAAoJEPHw56GfYleQ6sYP/Rt4dunLT7Q1GNifMtvvOQ+H +A+DD7uDmkbu9GwqCMWxcD2dZVP8PM+Vfc4ifIMS40OPljUidQRfU3b6Uq7TkeCa 3t/OMUIcWioFDhw2FCp2W6aQireXEUhCOcMGvzWxZs8XDYcLzCEg8SkxeY+yUPPu xaIHly+QsPORVoG6kgwcRh5ZsMEropTgSoTuctbg+ojJj5fGv9pTXiDRBEjFYFam 9StFYCVv3Svp3nSgfO5tR7p0p3Qtd5ZtSqpV0h4/13QSB5PBMu7lSYLD2+iFNAPK tChNmtaZqc7KDgU7egWrKiWbkVqCWPKAdVR0skNxf4LqRMkmz+M4ssNlxBQh11bl PoCGaboeeSDt/15df4VqwvUXG7AqIc7py4Hsm6DE6Mt9RARsS+Dn3e5ZdHxsr8xs bEuADkA5iznjy2ub76fzdu35/SGKGx9Av4z5PvDTSgUakPziT00/XlYuSic9xZRg IO3coB2oLaVepPW5FbqU6M3ZAQMXcSm+sdwR1uBG4XyTiPH380S1lz3lfDLGdcua KdOqCkLrb4O2kaSifDxq/OHe8hKY/2A50OtrLnlV4+mDhfMgdUWdEL2UFvA/PDwj oCEdP6DF+xmhNuV1kqJfCldgf2juZYpQtp0jGBZQQhGnCEWbeLlyXIFc68nQ5WEK YmOWRjK5eLo/ExkcJR7t =LPN4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X76sNqMhtiAor3OnEQWWqPhO9iQcW3xKo--