Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 May 1998 22:31:42 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com>
To:        paul@mu.org (Paul Saab)
Cc:        scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CAM/stable/BT-958 questions
Message-ID:  <199805200431.WAA25425@panzer.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980519194530.A16812@mu.org> from Paul Saab at "May 19, 98 07:45:30 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Saab wrote...
> Justin T. Gibbs (gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) wrote:
> > In article <Pine.SOL.3.96.980518164613.13767A-100000@keg.cs.vu.nl> you wrote:
> > > I have installed the CAM-980513-stable patch (file date: 15th May)
> > > on a 2.2-stable system (CTM delta 718). It seems to be running just
> > > fine, nevertheless I have a few questions:
> > > 
> > > 1. The README said:
> > > 
> > > "You will also likely want a "pass0" device.  Look in DM, LINT or
> > > GENERIC for examples."
> > > 
> > > However pass0 is not mentioned anywhere in LINT or GENERIC. I am not
> > > sure what DM is. Is pass0 a Current feature not applicable to Stable?
> > 
> > I forgot to bundle the DM config file with the 2.2-stable snapshot.
> > Sorry.  Pass0 is the pass through interface.  You'll need it in order
> > to use camcontrol or xmcd.
> 
> When I run camcontrol -l under -stable I get this...
> camcontrol: cam_real_open_device: Path Inquiry CCB failed
> cam_real_open_device: Inappropriate ioctl for device

	What it's telling you is that for some reason, the CAMIOCOMMAND
ioctl definition in camcontrol isn't the same as the CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl
definition in the kernel.

	Do you by any chance have some old CAM headers lying around
somewhere?  They'd be in /usr/include/cam/...

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@plutotech.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805200431.WAA25425>