Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 22:31:42 -0600 (MDT) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com> To: paul@mu.org (Paul Saab) Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM/stable/BT-958 questions Message-ID: <199805200431.WAA25425@panzer.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: <19980519194530.A16812@mu.org> from Paul Saab at "May 19, 98 07:45:30 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Saab wrote... > Justin T. Gibbs (gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) wrote: > > In article <Pine.SOL.3.96.980518164613.13767A-100000@keg.cs.vu.nl> you wrote: > > > I have installed the CAM-980513-stable patch (file date: 15th May) > > > on a 2.2-stable system (CTM delta 718). It seems to be running just > > > fine, nevertheless I have a few questions: > > > > > > 1. The README said: > > > > > > "You will also likely want a "pass0" device. Look in DM, LINT or > > > GENERIC for examples." > > > > > > However pass0 is not mentioned anywhere in LINT or GENERIC. I am not > > > sure what DM is. Is pass0 a Current feature not applicable to Stable? > > > > I forgot to bundle the DM config file with the 2.2-stable snapshot. > > Sorry. Pass0 is the pass through interface. You'll need it in order > > to use camcontrol or xmcd. > > When I run camcontrol -l under -stable I get this... > camcontrol: cam_real_open_device: Path Inquiry CCB failed > cam_real_open_device: Inappropriate ioctl for device What it's telling you is that for some reason, the CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl definition in camcontrol isn't the same as the CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl definition in the kernel. Do you by any chance have some old CAM headers lying around somewhere? They'd be in /usr/include/cam/... Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805200431.WAA25425>