From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 04:31:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CA3106566B for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from azanar@carrel.org) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A728FC0A for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 04:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so40138351iad.13 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.222.233 with SMTP id qp9mr65885060igc.1.1325651517204; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rowlf.sea.carrel.org (dsl231-050-036.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net. [216.231.50.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id py9sm93209599igc.2.2012.01.03.20.31.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:31:55 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Edward Carrel In-Reply-To: <20492D60-81BE-43A1-BCE1-594F5715ABF6@my.gd> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:30:21 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7999DEBF-0F29-4F94-8A69-942176004C4E@carrel.org> References: <4F02AC09.6080005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20492D60-81BE-43A1-BCE1-594F5715ABF6@my.gd> To: Damien Fleuriot X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Da Rock Subject: Re: pf not seeing inbound packets on netgraph interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:31:58 -0000 On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Thinking -pf@ or -net@ would be a better place to discuss this, more = chances of getting an answer. I was wondering about that. I'll send my question to -net@ to start. = Thanks. > Out of curiosity why not use a gif interface ? > I had that working just fine with racoon and was able to actually = firewall traffic on it with PF, iirc. =46rom what I understand of gif interfaces, they are useful when IPSec = is handling the tunnel pretty much end-to-end, and just needs a = passthrough interface to direct traffic to and from. If I am wrong about = this, please let me know. The reason why I'm using netgraph instead is because the LNS is not run = by me, and there is no other way of connecting to the other end but via = L2TP/IPSec.=20 If there is a way to use L2TP, and leverage a gif interface to complete = the loop on my end, I'd be interested to hear about it. Thanks, Ed Carrel=