From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Nov 21 10:26:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA06042 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:26:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ady.warpnet.ro (ady.warpnet.ro [193.230.201.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA05967 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:25:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Received: from localhost (ady@localhost) by ady.warpnet.ro (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA28785; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:24:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:24:19 +0200 (EET) From: Adrian Penisoara To: "Justin M. Seger" cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache12 In-Reply-To: <199811211340.IAA07961@freebsd.scds.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Sat, 21 Nov 1998, Justin M. Seger wrote: > Is there still an interest in having the Apache 1.2.6 port around? If >anyone has any strong reason to use 1.2.6 instead of 1.3.3, let me know. >Otherwise, I'll nuke the port next week. Well, I think it shouldn't be removed yet, there are many differences between 1.2.x and 1.3.x branches (like DSO & friends)... I believe while the source tarball is still available we should keep the apache12 port, just in case... > My $0.02 Ady (@freebsd.ady.ro) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message