From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Sep 22 03:56:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA08722 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 03:56:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA08701 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 03:56:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA04192; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:06:55 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199809220906.LAA04192@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: DUMMYNET To: cs@pollux.sdata.de Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 11:06:54 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199809220959.LAA05603@pollux.sdata.de> from "Christoph Splittgerber" at Sep 22, 98 11:58:57 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > what about this renaming-thing which poped up a couple of days ago ? > > "NETLIMIT" did sound good to me! Maybe we should really do that before > everybody gets used to DUMMYNET. DUMMYNET is already an esablished name. It has been out for two years now. The renaming was more to have something more indicative for those who still don't know it. but i agree that netlimit is a possibly good name for a manpage cheers luigi > > JMHO, Chris > > -- > *** Perfection is achieved only at the point of collapse.- C.N.Parkinson *** > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Email: chris@sdata.de PGP Key fingerprint: FE0899542E27761E57C4C8F3C6188F56 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message