From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Sep  2 13:44:19 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC9814BEF
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  2 Sep 1999 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk)
Received: from tdx.co.uk (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242])
	by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Kp) with ESMTP id VAA11506;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 21:44:15 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <37CEE18B.3495C9A5@tdx.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 21:43:55 +0100
From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>
Organization: TDX - The Digital eXchange
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chris@calldei.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CFD: "bogomips" CPU performance metric
References: <37CEB68D.848BDAF8@sftw.com> <19990902154111.A15805@tabby.kudra.com> <19990902154111.K26218@holly.dyndns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Chris Costello wrote:
> 
>    No, since it would just be useless bloat in the source tree.
> 

If we must have it, how about a port? - I'm definitely for the "this isn't a
good idea" crowd, When I was using Linux, I thought it was 'cute'... I've
grown up a bit since then...

-Kp


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message