From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 21 09:08:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88BE106566C for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339B38FC1B for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so3699383fxm.13 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TxFNLBnx8n7to4bdF/erxU0eD3ocjn8owEnJzsx7jno=; b=wcWFVfFx8v8AF2tutq9MU6pH7vb394eXKErfkuLPM5/Hf4rq1oOohd9JlsNMHCbSSH 6+mVJv+KapF63HODpSYnWXl+2cDLl8iqdbOf4JtHNwPAhXf3ugLbnSAw5q+QlcMitgmT EmmSkfkEiNSDj/8XFw8+Zq4qcmy9HPJTmGHoY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vy8cbGY1voOKHkAV24MHtJy6IDG6GOnKaM532Wnr8Z67EJPwATuLw82J6QhUCy8adx RG/B1nc/tyRGeq7QigyOGl0vq/Mb/FfJcrz/Njmx22ow2A2B1x+5itOzvhHOUx4AFxXz XtyR5cyIqccNcwM0NVDpURf1xXWZ+oe5RULzY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.167.1 with SMTP id d1mr575970hbe.43.1279703328060; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.239.160.201 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:08:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100720163651.0daf727d@scorpio> References: <4C452644.6060508@comclark.com> <20100720134205.3168f4f1@scorpio> <4C45EA1C.6070601@comclark.com> <20100720153209.74ec26e6@scorpio> <4C45FCE1.7010006@comclark.com> <20100720163651.0daf727d@scorpio> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:08:47 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: new jail utility is available. announcement. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:08:49 -0000 On 20 July 2010 21:36, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:45:37 +0800 > Aiza articulated: > > > > There has been the normal pre RELEASE freeze on since xmas, that is why > > no port activity is occurring right now. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D148777 > > Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:47:18 GMT > > It was only just submitted. I would hardly expect it to be committed > yet. > > By the way, there has been a great deal of port activity since > Christmas. > > -- > Jerry =E2=9C=8C > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, > and wrong. > > H. L. Mencken > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Anyone tried using it yet? Not much info out there apart from the announcments it seems. In my quick play with it this morning, it didnt seem to be binding the ips to the jails. Not sure if you are supposed to have th= e ip bound to the box before you use the jail. Would make sense if you did have to, but it would be nice if the util added it for you or at least prompted you if it wasnt there.