From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 12 08:52:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22F616A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 08:52:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D19A43D41 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 08:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvv@online.bg) Received: (qmail 20525 invoked by uid 510); 12 Sep 2004 08:49:59 -0000 Message-ID: <20040912084959.20524.qmail@gandalf.online.bg> References: <20040904162927.633e62b3@eric.placeverte.home> <20040904182948.27271.qmail@gandalf.online.bg> <20040905104221.6b8b4d44@eric.placeverte.home> In-Reply-To: <20040905104221.6b8b4d44@eric.placeverte.home> From: "dvv" To: messmate Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:49:59 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions-en Subject: Re: pf_freebsd_2.03 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 08:52:18 -0000 messmate writes: > Ok, i'll setup that release. > But pf_freebsd shoudn't in the 4.10 release, isn't ? > mess-mate It's not.If you want PF go to FreeBSD 5.2+. It's a decision of the FreeBSD developers not to introduce pf in the 4.x releases due to library and backport conflicts. If you want pf in 4.10, you're free to port it yourself there. Or use trickle+ipf or ipfw+natd/ipnat Best regards, Dimitar Vassilev