From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 26 7:18:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from webs1.accretive-networks.net (webs1.accretive-networks.net [207.246.154.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CF537B41B for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (davidk@localhost) by webs1.accretive-networks.net (8.11.1/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fAQFIKT31330; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:18:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:18:20 -0800 (PST) From: David Kirchner X-X-Sender: To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: Stephen Hovey , Subject: RE: this spam In-Reply-To: <002201c17655$fbe26320$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Message-ID: <20011126071615.P15780-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > While you may have decided that letting your users continue to get spam is OK, > that's your choice. However, in today's Internet environment, clearly the > Right Thing to do is for spam filtering to be centralized on the mailserver, This is OK to do as long as you make it very clear to each user when they're signing up that you are filtering their messages and you notify them of the chance that legitimate e-mail could be caught by filters (it happens). It's a good idea to allow users to opt-out of such filtering, too (although the anti-spammers will probably rail me for that suggestion. Heheh. opt-out. heheh.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message