From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 7 16:49:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B721116A4CE; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:49:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC0643D2F; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.0.34] (adsl-63-195-111-154.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.111.154]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i67GnHrb017090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:49:18 -0700 Message-ID: <40EC27C2.7060509@root.org> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:41:38 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <200407041623.i64GNPuv050165@repoman.freebsd.org> <200407071105.04341.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200407071105.04341.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Warner Losh cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_pcib_acpi.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:49:19 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Sunday 04 July 2004 12:23 pm, Warner Losh wrote: > >>imp 2004-07-04 16:23:25 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/dev/acpica acpi_pcib_acpi.c >> Log: >> Make the default memory range in the top 2GB of ram in the hopes that >> this more accurately reflects what the underlying hardware of most >> acpi machines that don't have children pci busses. >> >> We still need a better way to get this information from acpi/hardware. > > > s/better/ and AFAIK ACPI doesn't provide such information. :( Even if they > did it'd probably be as screwed up as the _BBN fiasco. Yeah, ACPI doesn't have it. I'm guessing the hw is the only way to get this info. -- -Nate