Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 23:00:12 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: socket and pcb reference changes entering tree today Message-ID: <20060402230012.GA24758@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <20060402233436.P76562@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060317141627.W2181@fledge.watson.org> <20060329100839.V19236@fledge.watson.org> <20060401102918.P79188@fledge.watson.org> <20060401170554.R82503@fledge.watson.org> <20060402233436.P76562@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:37:21PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > OK, so it's been >24 hours since this was committed, and I've not received > any bug reports yet. This means once of three things: > > (1) There are no bugs. > > (2) I've broken everyone's systems so badly they can't submit bug reports. > > (3) Everyone is waiting for everyone else to upgrade due to the advance > notice > of instability. > > I consider (1) highly likely, (2) a property of 1990's development and > we've left that time since most people have multiple machines now, and (3) > much more likely. > > Please help test these changes! I leave for a trip to the US on Thursday, > and I'd rather get things working before I leave than while on travel, it > will save a lot of hassle for everyone. > > And if you're reading this after spending 48 hours getting your systems > working again to the point where you can read e-mail, sorry :-). I've just updated a current system which also serves as a (socket based) backup system for a remotely hosted web site with LOTS of file updates. The update went without a hitch and the system seems to work fine AFAICT. I guess that sounds like a bit of an anti-climax, but there really isn't anything to report. Sorry. 8-) Perhaps I just don't know what to look for. Shrug. -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060402230012.GA24758>