From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 9:57:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de [131.220.161.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54F8137B742 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:57:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de) Received: (qmail 36880 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 17:56:09 -0000 Received: from merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de (131.220.161.121) by dirac.th.physik.uni-bonn.de with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:56:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 4202 invoked by uid 145); 21 Mar 2001 17:56:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 17:56:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:56:08 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Conrad To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Matt Dillon , Gordon Tetlow , Rich Morin , Subject: Re: NFS performance In-Reply-To: <20010321093906.E12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jan Conrad [010321 09:27] wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > > Do you know what actually determines the writing speed in a case like > > > > our's? Network or disk? > > > > > > Y'know, it would be a hell of a lot easier to figure out what was > > > wrong if you showed us the mount flags you're using. > > > > client: einstein > > server: merlin > > > > client: > > mount_nfs merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt > > > > 'mount' gives: > > merlin:/freebsd/misc on /mnt (nfs) > > Oh come on now, you didn't do a single thing that I asked you to! > > Did you bother to read the mount_nfs manpage? I did > > *slap* :-) got it > > try this: > > mount -t nfs \ > -o nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768 \ > merlin:/freebsd/misc /mnt works good, dd gives now 4.6 Mb/s mounting without tcp gives 8.7Mb/s thats great! thank you all very much -Jan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message