From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 21 20:30:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F7016A4C9 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3051443D46 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:30:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2LKUVuS031013 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:30:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2LKUVIw031012; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:30:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:30:31 GMT Message-Id: <200603212030.k2LKUVIw031012@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: Nate Lawson Cc: Subject: Re: i386/93963: [panic] [patch] ACPI Panic with some ACPI 2.0 PC & cannot boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nate Lawson List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:30:31 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/93963; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Lawson To: fukui.FreeBSD@fanet.net Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386/93963: [panic] [patch] ACPI Panic with some ACPI 2.0 PC & cannot boot Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:24:08 -0800 John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 20 March 2006 19:33, Mark Linimon wrote: >> Synopsis: [panic] [patch] ACPI Panic with some ACPI 2.0 PC & cannot boot >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-acpi >> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 21 00:31:09 UTC 2006 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> Over to maintainer(s). >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93963 > > The patch basically forces the use of ACPI 1.0 tables if the ACPI 2.0 table > pointer is NULL. This is really just more BIOS brain damage. Most of the > patch is to Intel's ACPI-CA code, so we need to see what they think about > this workaround. Fukui-san, Would you please submit the output of acpidump -t to the PR? This would help us understand the RSDT and XSDT on your machine. -- Nate