From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 23 12:38:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12052 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:38:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sunny.bog.msu.su (sunny.bog.msu.su [158.250.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12043 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:38:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@bog.msu.su) Received: from localhost (dima@localhost) by sunny.bog.msu.su (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA00704; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 23:37:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from dima@bog.msu.su) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 23:37:07 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Khrustalev To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Studded , patl@phoenix.volant.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is xtend in the base system? In-Reply-To: <1516.893359622@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Mike Smith, the executioner of the old driver, was supposed to come up > with something new which supported both mono and color QCs as a > pre-condition for being allowed to kill the old driver, but 2.2.6 sort > of happened in the middle of that and he got yanked into other > pursuits which delayed the fulfillment of those terms. We have gone This is exatly my point. I guess i somehow missed xtend port announcement. Surely person arguing for unbundling it had done a port. -Dima > so far as to purchase him one of each for testing (I see them sitting > on his shelf each time I walk into his office :) and now it's just > down to you QC users browbeating Mike into coughing up the promised > new support. :-) > > Jordan > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message