From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 4 19:19:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88BCD53A; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 19:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9C2759; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 19:19:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z2so1903376wiv.12 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:19:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OMfSZbMfEQtaFHxcdjhgwpbc+MC6engxIe2NQIZdekc=; b=cqNsPWc1pw4En4yz0GlLQ6/I0p+wuGq0h8PONOB5H1jr902/PyYnT5GJawGlKvSONH mFNRWnpNnOWiKkXFd6CEpFqLcbp13CK2SAjximk+Wt+51CODY+TXflxzBohp6yEV8+fD SF8zC6JwEH8l3hn9IK2qkLIdQO/I0Q0WAvPoxrTjHeqxCzfeG+M/8mJ8QlCwdSINM103 rUGk/88YBvqtp9sRYAgKDV41ftVWmBKEABvqLCNpljUjbulEVo7T7fyNvecblIYRUgje cdRW1ncGtdrqSvxcg0uhPHT3fZJUOh+k+n316cZlFr8O9wwbhufiy3NB0nil8RtXFb0l 5Fbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.73.19 with SMTP id h19mr6983007wiv.40.1396639193068; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: asomers@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.168.130 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:19:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140404190543.GA652@mastodon.meroh.net> References: <20140402085349.GA61802@x2.osted.lan> <20140404190543.GA652@mastodon.meroh.net> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:19:52 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sY9NvgNC-IkA7B1hfyuRzAcJ9ys Message-ID: Subject: Re: ATF work From: Alan Somers To: Julio Merino Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" , Peter Holm X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:19:55 -0000 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Julio Merino wrote: > Just a couple of minor comments: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:07:04AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> (Just to fill in some context on some of the items here) >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Alan Somers wrote: >> > lib/libc/tests/net/Makefile has one tested comment out with the >> > comment "test uses rump". Would it be possible instead to leave the >> > test in the build, but put "require.progs rump_server" in the relevant >> > test cases' heads? >> >> Probably carryover from NetBSD that should be pushed back to NetBSD. > > Why? rump is "standard" in NetBSD so that's probably not going to fly. > It'd be like saying "require.progs = ls". I don't know about NetBSD, but FreeBSD has a lot of optional stuff in base that's compiled in by default. For example, the entire Bluetooth stack can be disabled by WITHOUT_BLUETOOTH=yes make buildworld. At $WORK, I disabled a whole bunch of stuff that way to slim down our product's image. A deeply embedded system, I'm sure, would disable even more. If rump can be disabled in a NetBSD build, then it would be worthwhile for rump-based ATF tests to identify themselves via require.progs. -Alan