Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Nov 2024 22:12:34 +0100
From:      =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= <olivier@freebsd.org>
To:        Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Igor Ostapenko <igoro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-testing@freebsd.org,  freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Add required_klds metadata to Kyua
Message-ID:  <CA%2Bq%2BTco9zBndP6WiJ8-rNWfXy%2BNJMSf%2B4aVsOTf6LpS_=r%2BF1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9975A26D-6AB4-433F-B4B2-515F956BF366@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <9fc6fc72-4c2c-4b09-bdb5-122a49b45295@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2Bq%2BTcpLeVqHhtL7VHvWsijQO9sxewY5opeUQ895G43EC24qgg@mail.gmail.com> <9975A26D-6AB4-433F-B4B2-515F956BF366@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000aae642062644fa4a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:27=E2=80=AFPM Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> wro=
te:

> That said, perhaps we don=E2=80=99t need to worry about that just yet. It=
=E2=80=99s a
> minority of tests that forbid modules, so those can just keep doing what
> they=E2=80=99re doing already (i.e. run exclusively, do the checks in the=
 test
> script itself). It shouldn=E2=80=99t stop us from making the majority of =
tests
> better.
>

Yes, I totally agree. The benefits of running parallel jailed tests far
outweigh the very few tests that won't support module unloading.
Regards.

--000000000000aae642062644fa4a
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"fon=
t-family:&quot;courier new&quot;,monospace"><br></div></div><div class=3D"g=
mail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:=
27=E2=80=AFPM Kristof Provost &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kp@freebsd.org">kp@free=
bsd.org</a>&gt; wrote:</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1e=
x"><div><div style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><div style=3D"white-space:nor=
mal">
<p dir=3D"auto">That said, perhaps we don=E2=80=99t need to worry about tha=
t just yet. It=E2=80=99s a minority of tests that forbid modules, so those =
can just keep doing what they=E2=80=99re doing already (i.e. run exclusivel=
y, do the checks in the test script itself). It shouldn=E2=80=99t stop us f=
rom making the majority of tests better.</p></div></div></div></blockquote>=
<div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:&quot;cour=
ier new&quot;,monospace">Yes, I totally agree. The benefits of running para=
llel jailed tests far outweigh the very few tests that won&#39;t support mo=
dule unloading.<br>Regards.</div></div></div>

--000000000000aae642062644fa4a--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTco9zBndP6WiJ8-rNWfXy%2BNJMSf%2B4aVsOTf6LpS_=r%2BF1Q>