Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 22:12:34 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= <olivier@freebsd.org> To: Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> Cc: Igor Ostapenko <igoro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-testing@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Add required_klds metadata to Kyua Message-ID: <CA%2Bq%2BTco9zBndP6WiJ8-rNWfXy%2BNJMSf%2B4aVsOTf6LpS_=r%2BF1Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9975A26D-6AB4-433F-B4B2-515F956BF366@FreeBSD.org> References: <9fc6fc72-4c2c-4b09-bdb5-122a49b45295@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2Bq%2BTcpLeVqHhtL7VHvWsijQO9sxewY5opeUQ895G43EC24qgg@mail.gmail.com> <9975A26D-6AB4-433F-B4B2-515F956BF366@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000aae642062644fa4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:27=E2=80=AFPM Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> wro= te: > That said, perhaps we don=E2=80=99t need to worry about that just yet. It= =E2=80=99s a > minority of tests that forbid modules, so those can just keep doing what > they=E2=80=99re doing already (i.e. run exclusively, do the checks in the= test > script itself). It shouldn=E2=80=99t stop us from making the majority of = tests > better. > Yes, I totally agree. The benefits of running parallel jailed tests far outweigh the very few tests that won't support module unloading. Regards. --000000000000aae642062644fa4a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"fon= t-family:"courier new",monospace"><br></div></div><div class=3D"g= mail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:= 27=E2=80=AFPM Kristof Provost <<a href=3D"mailto:kp@freebsd.org">kp@free= bsd.org</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg= in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1e= x"><div><div style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><div style=3D"white-space:nor= mal"> <p dir=3D"auto">That said, perhaps we don=E2=80=99t need to worry about tha= t just yet. It=E2=80=99s a minority of tests that forbid modules, so those = can just keep doing what they=E2=80=99re doing already (i.e. run exclusivel= y, do the checks in the test script itself). It shouldn=E2=80=99t stop us f= rom making the majority of tests better.</p></div></div></div></blockquote>= <div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-family:"cour= ier new",monospace">Yes, I totally agree. The benefits of running para= llel jailed tests far outweigh the very few tests that won't support mo= dule unloading.<br>Regards.</div></div></div> --000000000000aae642062644fa4a--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTco9zBndP6WiJ8-rNWfXy%2BNJMSf%2B4aVsOTf6LpS_=r%2BF1Q>