From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 22:33:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4547F37B401 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asclepius.uwa.edu.au (asclepius.uwa.edu.au [130.95.128.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B3743F93 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:33:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from riggi-in-au@gmx.net) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dummy.domain.name (Postfix) with SMTP id 161B02F8C64; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:33:16 +0800 (WST) Received: from obelvisitor1 (obelvisitor1.ee.uwa.edu.au [130.95.136.101]) by asclepius.uwa.edu.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 10E502F8898; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:33:15 +0800 (WST) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:33:16 +0800 From: Thomas E.Zander To: ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030410133316.584711cc.riggi-in-au@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Who maintains the yacas port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 05:33:21 -0000 Moyn. On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 04:56:26 +0000 (UTC) blueeskimo@gmx.net (Adam) wrote: > The yacas Makefile (/usr/ports/math/yacas) has ports@freebsd.org listed > as the MAINTAINER. I'm wondering who the actual maintainer is. The > current ports version is 1.0.53r1, which is extremely old now. There > have been at least 9-10 public revisions since then. *remember* I had an update in the queue: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/50016 Unfortunately it produced some building trouble on Olis 4.8 box. That's why it hasn't been committed yet. I should have checked what the actual problem was, but I was a bit lazy, shame on me... You could take this diff and look if you can quickly isolate the build problem. But seriously, if you use it frequently, you should take maintainership, it seems that many peoply (including me) only use it from time to time. Riggs