From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Apr 11 14:54:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk [129.215.144.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED2237B424 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk) Received: from banks.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (banks [129.215.144.55]) by rhymer.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00194; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:53:54 +0100 (BST) Received: (from richard@localhost) by banks.cogsci.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id WAA00825; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:53:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:53:45 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200104112153.WAA00825@banks.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> From: Richard Tobin Subject: RE: nVidia Cards /w FreeBSD (3D Acceleration) To: "Juha Saarinen" , "Kal Torak" , "The Hermit Hacker" In-Reply-To: Juha Saarinen's message of Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:44:20 +1200 Organization: just say no Cc: "Jonathan Belson" , "FreeBSD-stable" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Before you lambast Nvidia for wanting to keep its IP > under wraps, it appears that none of the other video card makers (ATI, > Matrox) have handed over their "crown jewels" to Open Source developers. > Nvidia is at least providing an optimised driver for its cards -- Matrox and > ATI haven't So how come we haven't even got the XVideo extension available on GeForce cards, unlike ATI and Matrox? Sounds fair to lambast NVidia to me. -- Richard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message