From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 07:47:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C8C16A4CE; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 07:47:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A2943D39; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 07:47:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i587lm7m084143; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:47:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)i587lmS5084142; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:47:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])i587h92f004291; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:43:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200406080743.i587h92f004291@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Ken Smith In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 07 Jun 2004 22:47:46 EDT." <20040608024746.GB25445@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:43:09 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: des@FreeBSD.ORG cc: "M. Warner Losh" cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT cfg_local.pm X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 07:47:59 -0000 Ken Smith writes: > It sounds like it would be better for the system to say "UTC" instead > of "GMT" in the absence of /etc/localtime. Does anyone disagree? /Au contraire./ I think that the default _should_ be UTC, and let us regional GMT users set it to that (locally) if we so desire. > Warner correctly mentioned it would be best to check with the standards > folks but my best guess on who that would be is Garrett Wollman and > I'm fairly sure he chimes in on these sorts of messages on this list > when appropriate. The zoneinfo files are probably as close to authority as you are going to get without consulting national/regional authorities. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH