Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 23:17:32 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Ladavac Marino <mladavac@metropolitan.at> Cc: "'Brian F. Feldman'" <green@FreeBSD.org>, Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp>, bright@rush.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, jon@oaktree.co.uk, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org, tech@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Message-ID: <378C9BFC.A3273D45@newsguy.com> References: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C11002761796F3@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ladavac Marino wrote: > > This topic has been trashed to death a few months ago. There is no > win-win situation in presence of processes which allocate a lot of memory > without actually using it (read: your typical FORTRAN library). This is not about just Fortran libraries. Imagine a reasonably big program, like Netscape or Emacs, of which you usually just use a subset of features. There can easily be many megabytes of code and data in them you never actually use, or you don't _usually_ use (like the people who use emacs like it was vi :). Without overcommit, you need to allocate all that memory for the code, no matter whether you end up using it or not. With overcommit, there is no such problem. And that's not all, either. Hell, people, if overcommit was not useful, everybody wouldn't be doing it. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Would you like to go out with me?" "I'd love to." "Oh, well, n... err... would you?... ahh... huh... what do I do next?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?378C9BFC.A3273D45>