From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 5 9:54: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from canonware.com (dsl081-058-209.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.58.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC6C37B41D for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by canonware.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 335D3DF; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:03:41 -0700 From: Jason Evans To: "E.B. Dreger" Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AIO issues... or not? Message-ID: <20011005100340.T76373@canonware.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net on Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 02:19:58PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 02:19:58PM +0000, E.B. Dreger wrote: > > However, there's a rather ominous and non-descriptive warning > present: "There are numerous stability issues in the current aio > code that make it unsuitable for inclusion on shell boxes." Can > anyone please elaborate? Is this admonition outdated? > > Seen on 4.3-R. Alan Cox has done a lot of work to make aio stable over the past year, and I'm guessing that it's reasonably stable as of 4.2 or 4.3. That warning can likely be removed. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message