From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 23 18:38:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4289316A401 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189C213C4D0 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0NIc6Qe088755; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:38:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <45B6560E.5080302@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:38:06 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, fernan.aguero@gmail.com References: <200701231830.l0NIURmC083278@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200701231830.l0NIURmC083278@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2480/Tue Jan 23 05:21:51 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: Subject: Re: clear metadata using dd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:38:09 -0000 On 01/23/07 12:30, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed this message today, and there's one thing > I don't understand ... > > Fernan Aguero wrote: > > I'm trying to set up two disks to contain both gmirrored and > > gstriped slices. > > > > This is what I'm trying to achieve: > > adxs1, swap > > adxs2, gmirror > > adxs3, gstripe > > Can someone please explain why such a setup makes sense? > > As far as I can tell, the purpose of gmirror is to provide > redundancy in the case of drive failure. I.e. if one > drive fails, the system keeps running happily instead of > crashing. > > But if only part of the disk is mirrored, then the system > will still crash if one drive fails. So what is the point > of using gmirror, if not on whole disks? You might crash, but the data on the mirror on one of the disks is still there, so you haven't lost all the data. Eric