Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:44:09 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Antal Rutz <arutz@mimoza.pantel.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <xzp3cakul86.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> (Antal Rutz's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:39:03 %2B0100") References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Antal Rutz <arutz@mimoza.pantel.net> writes: > I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD. > I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or= =20 > bi-monthly. We used to, but it proved to be too hard to get people to actually send in material for the report. There are basically two ways to do this: 1) get committers to submit status reports about the work they have done or are currently doing. Doesn't seem to work. 2) have somebody keep track of everything that happens and write it down. Nobody has volunteered so far (though bmah@ does it to some extent with the release notes) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3cakul86.fsf>