From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 22 14:16:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD33837B41F; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:16:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0291.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.36] helo=mindspring.com) by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16oXKk-00007y-00; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:16:26 -0800 Message-ID: <3C9BAD26.A314A5FB@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:16:06 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson Cc: David Wolfskill , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Peculiar(?) slowdown with -CURRENT as of 21 March References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert Watson wrote: > > On a 0 - 10 "weirdness" scale, this ranks about a 4, perhaps, so it's > > hardly earth-shattering. But it's odd enough that I thought that a > > small reality check might be in order, in case the effect(s) in question > > were not expected. (And yes, I understand that a degree of uncertainty > > with respect to -CURRENT's performance is to be expected, even at the > > best of times. This is not a complaint.) > > Could be the removal of __P :-) Speed difference between K&R and ANSI compilers? 8-) 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message