From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 29 22:25:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4135991 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frv191.fwdcdn.com (frv191.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 991B51D0F for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.1.30] (helo=frv196.fwdcdn.com) by frv191.fwdcdn.com with esmtp ID 1W8dZ4-0003ss-FH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:58 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=ffe; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date; bh=hdIHBEDm9Sc9jGQybZ6mJaVUDW1/Lj9iffp9QqVqsYA=; b=eBy6tGaAimg4bvKnZKTEF3wX/lBQJVKtve4zNR75tCuS27pjLmVdJAnQEhqIZ7Y5Mx3vKs8n6nU6vz0g2ksNBOdXo8FwhUuYgd5vkxtJjavZthD95hqmbxX8NoWUtORXTzcsZKJ4NjwG5FttsimSxXJ7VO5ivJsMoAl5Gt1CWNM=; Received: from [10.10.10.35] (helo=frv35.ukr.net) by frv196.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1W8dYs-000Kov-Ar for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200 From: Vladislav Prodan Subject: Re[2]: Necessary to implement static NAT 1:1 To: Joshua Smith X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0 Message-Id: <1391034285.808273914.tglqx9fb@frv35.ukr.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv35.ukr.net; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:24:46 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Disposition: inline Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:25:01 -0000 > Just curious why one would use natd instead of the in kernel nat available as either part of ipfw or pf. > > > Regards, > -- > Josh Smith > KD8HRX > I just do not know other ways to natd and tablearg for 20k IP. Can offer a how-to which direction to go? -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE