From owner-freebsd-hardware Sun Sep 13 08:29:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA10801 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from laker.net (jet.laker.net [205.245.74.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA10788 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 08:29:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sfriedri@laker.net) Received: from nt (digital-pbi-135.laker.net [208.0.233.35]) by laker.net (8.9.0/8.9.LAKERNET.NO-SPAM.SPAMMERS.AND.RELAYS.WILL.BE.TRACKED.AND.PROSECUTED.) with SMTP id LAA09836; Sun, 13 Sep 1998 11:29:18 -0400 Message-Id: <199809131529.LAA09836@laker.net> From: "Steve Friedrich" To: "Castor Fu" , "Duncan Barclay" Cc: "freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG" , "spork" Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 11:28:02 -0400 Reply-To: "Steve Friedrich" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows NT (4.0.1381;3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "Cacheable memory"?? Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 13 Sep 1998 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT), Castor Fu wrote: >I was rather leary of the Ali5 because ALI is an acer subsidiary and >Acer's motherboard arm, AOpen, uses the MVP-3 in their super 7 board. >I figure if ALI couldn't get a design win with their own companies, there's >something you don't want to find out. They might have lost simply on a cost basis. Anyone know for sure ?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message