From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 11 17:48:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA08045 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 11 May 1996 17:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hemi.com (hemi.com [204.132.158.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA08040 for ; Sat, 11 May 1996 17:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mbarkah@localhost) by hemi.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA02258; Sat, 11 May 1996 18:53:56 -0600 From: Ade Barkah Message-Id: <199605120053.SAA02258@hemi.com> Subject: Re: Copyright question To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 18:53:56 -0600 (MDT) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <25051.831590192@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at May 8, 96 02:16:32 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > o How does the addition of 4th condition in the copyright > > affect any inclusion in FreeBSD? Is it too restrictive? > > I'd say it's a little iffy. For example, let's say I have a condor > board and I build a kernel for it after seeing the entry in LINT > (bearing in mind that most people never even _look_ at the source > code). ... What if the driver prints out that 4th condition during boot-up ? -Ade ------------------------------------------------------------------- Inet: mbarkah@hemi.com - HEMISPHERE ONLINE - -------------------------------------------------------------------