From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 23 15:24:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BAD1065675; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318CF8FC20; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8NFOsJs096531; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m8NFOsal096530; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:24:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Sam Leffler Message-ID: <20080923152454.GA96501@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200809231446.m8NEkQev007507@repoman.freebsd.org> <48D9038B.3040000@freebsd.org> <20080923151353.GC50098@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080923151353.GC50098@dragon.NUXI.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/fs/tmpfs tmpfs.h tmpfs_subr.c tmpfs_vnops.c src/sys/i386/i386 bios.c src/sys/ia64/ia64 efi.c sal.c src/sys/libkern memcmp.c src/sys/mips/mips support.S src/sys/sys libkern.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:24:55 -0000 On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:13:53AM -0700, David O'Brien (@FreeBSD) wrote: > So provide a proper memcmp(9), but it is a C implementation not > a tuned assembly implementation. Therefore bcmp(9) should be > preferred over memcmp(9). Perhaps I should have mentioned that not every FreeBSD arch has an assembly implementation. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)