From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 17 17:23:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2032316A401 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from host.omnisec.de (host.omnisec.de [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FA113C4BB for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) Received: from [172.21.1.26] (akima-win.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [172.21.1.26]) (authenticated bits=0) by host.omnisec.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6HHIU4D092400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:18:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de) X-Authentication-Warning: smtp.dmz.omnisec.de: Host akima-win.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de [172.21.1.26] claimed to be [172.21.1.26] Message-ID: <469CF9E5.2080200@omnisec.de> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:18:29 +0200 From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniSEC User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: ich9 ahci support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:23:08 -0000 Hello, does anybody know if there's a difference in accessing ich8 vs. ich9? Is it enough to add ID bits to support it? Thanks, -Harry