Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 03:56:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237479] sysutils/vm-bhyve: need a more robust "vm stopall" Message-ID: <bug-237479-7788-WBvDAB7AXm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237479-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237479-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237479 Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Victor Sudakov from comment #0) I would like to see some enhancements in a few aspects of this request, for= one the idea of an ordered shutdown of the vm's given a list, but not a reverse list of /etc/rc.conf vm_list would be useful. ESXi does this, but they get= it wrong in that the list is infact just the reverse of the startup, and that = has many issues. I see good use for the "kill them with ACPI shutdown, then wait N seconds, = then reap them with a harder signal" as useful. I would also like to understand why we repeat the killall that is there now. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237479-7788-WBvDAB7AXm>