From owner-cvs-all Mon Feb 17 18:25:16 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1EF37B401 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A209943F3F for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:25:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1I2PE1o028552; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:25:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1I2PE0O002071; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:25:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h1I2PEKn002070; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:25:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:25:13 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Julian Elischer Cc: Jake Burkholder , Scott Long , Julian Elischer , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha exception.s genassym.c Message-ID: <20030218022513.GA1973@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030217152317.D81102@locore.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:20:57PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I presumed you'd tested it.. in fact I was led to believe you had.. > I just compiled it. > I have no sparc I can reboot. > > I'm more worried about the ia64 patch. If you cared enough to have it reviewed or tested by me before you committed it, I've taken away all your worries (I'm almost there when it comes to healing people :-). I'm not saying that you should've, just that there's no point worrying about it now. > As a sidebar, in my opinion sparc is irrelevant except as a porting > exercize to keep the code clean. I think it is damaging to the project > to have it a tier 1 architecture. My girlfriend left me because sparc is a tier 1 platform. I so totally understand what you're saying... NOT! -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message