From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 19:02:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A25573A for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6E297A for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lams18 with SMTP id s18so8018323lam.11 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:02:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2n6Qmkb2PPCllSXVp0F59VTm6eWzZ3kpmu/viRg0ApA=; b=JB6QJCw0jNMm/E6z94gW2TpMef1GKaDeyRmYJVWXUtnRGo02grk2HJKbt4gjGVL9HC JwrSyaK3AdxiOzhIjpSUe2kBeuDHfBiPv0WPZP0ZH3UwG4u9CFoBMLbwDrzd2WZ1vvyU FPbcRycUw+ZCBB262/UpYIwSAPXVdGAXf2jsTcxA+ACMY9WDgWRAI56EYs5Yk/FwQKyf THI4jdkf0CEi0WpM44XZFGjFQGJzeEMM7o+Q0zHI5x7flyuwcSJKwyn6DVzSgtDOkto4 lakr7mZd4cw3pkaU1EjD9TLxVSPDIa0TOe1itT93FyYOqabIVeF8rDKkT12CuV1xkV2L EB+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.135.196 with SMTP id pu4mr9622025lbb.41.1424458922690; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.78.131 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:02:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54E76B47.8080907@gmail.com> References: <54DCB8F2.5090809@gmail.com> <54E76B47.8080907@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:02:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1: Intel dual port 10GbE card (82599EB) second port not present? From: Ryan Stone To: John Jasen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Net , Jack Vogel X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:02:05 -0000 I think that you might be a bit confused about the behaviour. An ix port will only be missing if a) You have a non-Intel SFP+ installed b) hw.ix.unsupported_sfp=1 is not set in loader.conf ix ports that have no SFP+ installed do show up in ifconfig