From owner-freebsd-multimedia Wed Jan 29 20:03:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA17209 for multimedia-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:03:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA17204 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:03:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA27066; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:02:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 20:02:53 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Mark Taylor cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SoundBlaster Pro 2 card stops for video output In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Mark Taylor wrote: > >> The sound is fine unless I have another window scrolling text (as in > >> "while [ 1 ]; do ps -ax; done"). At that time, the sound seems to > >> stop playing (the sound process starves?). > > > >I can't reproduce this on my P100, GUS PnP, and ATI Mach64 video using > >your command (under X -- the ps -ax is barely doing anything!) > > > >What's your video card? > > A Diamond Stealth 64 w/ 2 Mb DRAM, running Accelerated-X 2.1. Well, I'm on XFree86, so it may be accelX related... > >DMA 1 may be used by something else; also, the shared DMA may be confusing > >it. (Wait -- a Pro isn't a 16 bit device, it only has one DMA channel!) > > That's right- it's supposed to be an 8 bit card, but it has a the > extension for the 16 bit ISA bus. Hmmm... > > > > >> I have DMA channel 1 and IRQ channels 5 and 7 set for "Legacy ISA" in the BIOS > >> config (yes, there are four PCI devices in there: de0, video, PCI IDE, > >> and USB port), so nothing should be stealing the IRQ or DMA channel. > > > >How about other ISA devices? > > There are no other ISA cards in the machine! Everything else checks out, or so it appears. The only thing I can think of is that accelX is stickier about video output that XFree is. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major