Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:22:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: wollman@lcs.mit.edu, tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: standards/36783 Message-ID: <200204121822.g3CIM4491247@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20020412.121645.03985114.imp@village.org> References: <200204121240.g3CCe3a52899@freefall.freebsd.org> <200204121639.g3CGdOZ90234@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20020412.121645.03985114.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:16:45 -0600 (MDT), "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> said: > This is no longer true. Long doubles can and do give better precision > than doubles, but at a high performance cost. Is GCC now emitting code to change the rounding mode from 53-bit to 80-bit whenever it works with long doubles? -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200204121822.g3CIM4491247>